How do Qi Coils compare to other devices claiming higher gauss ratings?Updated 22 days ago

While some older devices might boast high gauss ratings, these figures often don't translate to effective energy delivery to the body's cells. For instance, our Qi Coil Max has been physically compared using an EM field meter to other loops that use a pulse method. Despite the high numbers listed by these older devices, our tests show that the Qi Coil Max is approximately three times stronger and maintains a consistent field, proving that higher gauss numbers are not always indicative of better performance.

It's like comparing a car claiming 6000 horsepower but lacking proper tires; much of its power is inefficiently used and doesn't effectively impact the target. In the realm of frequency therapy, the effectiveness isn't solely based on gauss. Much like having large muscles doesn't necessarily equate to being healthy, higher gauss ratings don't automatically mean better health outcomes.

Our Qi Coils are designed for efficiency, delivering energy in a precise, controlled manner—think of it as the difference between a scattergun approach and a precise laser. Increasing the gauss would be overkill due to our highly efficient delivery method. Moreover, Qi Coils aren't just about magnetism; they incorporate a synergy of frequency, sequence, sound, vibration, vortex energy (torus), and scalar waves, all tailored to maximize therapeutic impact without unnecessary power.

It's similar to listening to music; louder isn't always better, as the quality of the sound and its emotional impact matter more. Users of older devices are often pleasantly surprised by how much more effective Qi Coils are once they try them, leading many to transition away from their old equipment. This is a frequent occurrence and highlights the advanced capabilities of Qi Coils in the field of frequency therapy.